Skip to main content
Log in

Invertebrate recolonization of fine-grained beneficial use schemes: An example from the southeast coast of England

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The disposal of maintenance dredged material constitutes one of the most important problems in coastal zone management. To minimise ecological impacts, a number of ‘beneficial use’ options have developed whereby the material is regarded as a potential resource and used to recharge or recreate intertidal habitats. This paper presents the results of a sampling programme to investigate the macrofaunal recovery rates, and the underlying mechanisms responsible for them, following a beneficial use scheme involving the placement of fine-grained dredged material on a salt marsh in southeast England.

Three stations in the recharge area and three reference stations, located within the same salt marsh system, were selected. These stations were sampled prior to recharge (recharge stations only) then 1 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after the recharge. Sediment redox potentials (1, 2 and 4 cm sediment depths) were also measured on each sampling occasion. The results indicated a rapid recolonization of the fauna typical of the surrounding salt marsh channels. All univariate parameters had recovered after 3 months after the recharge. Active post-juvenile immigration is likely to have been the predominant recovery process. Multivariate data analysis revealed that the community structure of the recharge stations, however, did not progress towards those of the reference sites. Natural spatial variability in community structure at the scale of the recharge-reference station distance, and differences in eventual tidal elevations are factors responsible for these differences. The need to carefully assess reference site suitability in monitoring beneficial use schemes is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MDS:

Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling

References

  • Anon. 1998.The convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic. OSPAR. www.ospar.org

  • Armonies, W. 1988. Active emergence of meiofauna from intertidal sediment.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 43: 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armonies, W. 1994. Drifting meio- and macrobenthic invertebrates on tidal flats in Königshafen: a review.Helgol. Meeresunters. 48: 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, S.G. 1999.An investigation into the processes responsible for generating the spatial patterns exhibited by the spionid polychaete Pygospio elegans Claparede on intertidal sandflats. Ph.D. Thesis, Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, S.G. & Fernandes, T.F. 2002. Dense aggregations of tube-building polychaetes: response to small-scale disturbances.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 269: 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, S.G. et al. 2003. Intertidal placement of dredged material: a biological perspective. In:Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, pp. 3606–3615. World Scientific, Inc., Cardiff, Wales, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, J.C. et al. 2001. Assessment and monitoring. In: Zedler, J.B. (ed.)Restoring tidal wetlands, pp. 271–336. marine Science Series, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekara, W.U. & Frid, C.J. 1998. A laboratory assessment of the survival and vertical movement of two epibenthic gastropod species,Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) andLittorina littorea (Linnaeus), after burial in sediment.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 221: 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, V.J. et al. 1995. Post-settlement movement by intertidal benthic macroinvertebrates: do common New Zealand species drift in the water column?N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 29: 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essink, K. 1999. Ecological effects of dumping of dredged sediments: options for management.J. Coastal Conserv. 5: 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P.R. et al. 1998. Creation of temperate-climate intertidal mudflats: factors affecting colonisation and use by benthic invertebrates and their bird predators.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 37: 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.H. 1979.Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laselle, M.W., Landin, M.C. & Sims, J.G. 1991. Evaluation of the flora and fauna of aSpartina alterniflora marsh established on dredged material in Winyah Bay, South Carolina.Wetlands 11: 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L.A. 1984a. Life history and dispersal patterns in a dense infaunal polychaete assemblage: community structure and response to disturbance.Ecology 65: 1185–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L.A. 1984b. Multiple patterns of development inStreblospio benedicti Webster (Spionidae) from three coasts of North America.Biol. Bull. 166: 494–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L.A., Talley, D. & Thayer, G. 1996. Succession of macrobenthos in a created salt marsh.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 141: 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. et al. 1982. Vertical migration and mortality of benthos in dredged material—Part I: Mollusca.Mar. Environ. Res. 4: 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. et al. 1982. Vertical migration and mortality of benthos in dredged material: Part III—Polychaeta.Mar. Environ. Res. 6: 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J.W. 1977.Ecological effect of dredging and dredge spoil disposal: A literature review. Technical Papers of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 94/33S, pp. 1–30. Washington, DC, US.

  • Murray, L.A. 1994. Progress in England and Wales on the development of beneficial uses of dredged material. In:Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Dredging’94, 13–16th November 1994, pp. 664–653. Lake Buena Vista, FL, US.

  • Pearson, T.H. & Stanley, S.O. 1979. Comparative measurement of the redox potential of marine sediments as a rapid means of assessing the effect of organic pollution.Marine Biol. 53: 371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posey, M.H., Alphin, T.D. & Powell, C.M. 1997. Plant and infaunal communities associated with a created marsh.Estuaries 20: 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G.L. et al. 1994. Construction of intertidal mudflats as a beneficial use of dredged material.Dredging 94: 946–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R.D., Gregory, M.R. & Foster, B.A. 1998. Developing an efficient macrofauna monitoring index from an impact study—a dredge spoil example.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 36: 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulenberger, E. 1970. Responses ofGemma gemma to a catastrophic burial.Veliger 13: 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, D.H. 1997. Mechanisms of infaunal polychaete dispersal and colonization in an intertidal sandflat.J. Mar. Res. 55: 153–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.R. & Brumsickle, S.J. 1989. The effects of patch size and substrate isolation on colonization modes and rates in an intertidal sediment.Limmol. Oceanogr. 34: 1263–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streever, W.J. 2000.Spartina alterniflora marshes on dredged material: a critical review of the ongoing debate over success.Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 8: 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dolah, R.F., Calder, D.R. & Knott, D.M. 1984. Effects of dredging and open-water disposal on benthic macroinvertebrates in a South Carolina estuary.Estuaries 7: 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, C. & Walls, B. 1991. Environmental effects of dredged material disposal—EPA concerns and regulations. In:Proceedings of the 24th Annual Dredging Seminar 1991, pp. 71–80. Texas Engineering Experiment Station, College Station, TX, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldock, R. et al. 1999. Surveys of the benthic infauna of the Crouch Estuary (UK) in relation to TBT contamination.J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 79: 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R.M. & Clarke, K.R. 1994.Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Natural Environment Research Council, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.H. Jr. 1992. Dispersal of adult infaunal organisms: lateral or vertical migration?Annu. Meeting Am. Soc. Zool. 32: 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.H. Jr. 1994. Dispersal of soft-bottom benthos: migration through the water column or through the sediment? In: Wilson, W.H., Stricker, S.A. & Shinn, G.L. (eds.)Dispersal of benthic infauna. Symposium of reproduction and development of marine invertebrates, pp. 302–312. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. 1984.Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bolam S. G..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolam, S.G., Whomersley, P. Invertebrate recolonization of fine-grained beneficial use schemes: An example from the southeast coast of England. J Coast Conserv 9, 159–169 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2003)009[0159:IROFBU]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2003)009[0159:IROFBU]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Navigation